Erise IP logo

Managing IP Features Jennifer Bailey on pre-AIA On-Sale Bar Interpretation

//

On January 22, 2019, the Supreme Court unanimously held Helsinn v. Teva maintains status quo of pre-America Invents Act precedent regarding secret sales.

Many in the Patent Bar, including the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, pointed to the catchall language in Section 102(a)(1) that an invention was considered “on sale” or “otherwise made available to the public.” The USPTO interpreted Section 102(a)(1) as changing the pre-AIA law, such that if the sale was secret, then it was not barring.

Erise IP shareholder Jennifer Bailey told Managing IP, “The patent office’s interpretation is more consistent with European practice, which requires an enabling prior public use or sale to be an invalidating sale/use barring patentability.”

Related Articles

Erise and Five Shareholders Ranked in 2024 IAM Patent 1000 Guide
Erise Again Ranked Among U.S. News & World Report’s Best Law Firms
Erise and Five Shareholders Ranked in 2024 IAM Patent 1000 Guide
For Third Year in a Row, Law360 Recognizes Erise as a “Ceiling Smasher” for Women Partners
Erise and Five Shareholders Ranked in 2024 IAM Patent 1000 Guide
Erise’s Patent Defense Victory for Sony Affirmed by Federal Circuit
Skip to content