Erise IP Obtains Another Victory for Unified Patents in PTAB Final Written Decision

//

Erise IP shareholders Eric Buresh and Jason Mudd and associate Hunter Horton secured a victory on behalf of Unified Patents after the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a final written decision that numerous claims of a non-practicing entity’s patent are invalid.

The patent at the center of the IPR relates to a “system, apparatus, and methods for proactive allocation of wireless communication resources.” It has also been asserted in the Eastern District of Texas against two large telecommunications companies.

Buresh, Mudd, and Horton were able to successfully demonstrate that the claims would have been obvious over the prior art at the time the alleged invention was made.

Related Articles

Eight Erise Attorneys Selected to 2024 Super Lawyers Lists
Erise’s Buresh and Seitz honored again by Benchmark as Litigation Stars
Eight Erise Attorneys Selected to 2024 Super Lawyers Lists
Nine Erise Attorneys Included in 2025 Edition of The Best Lawyers in America®
Eight Erise Attorneys Selected to 2024 Super Lawyers Lists
For Third Year in a Row, Law360 Recognizes Erise as a “Ceiling Smasher” for Women Partners
Skip to content