Erise Victorious at the PTAB

//

Erise IP shareholders Adam Seitz and Paul Hart scored another win at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board when the panel invalidated claims after Erise “persuasively demonstrated that a skilled artisan would have been motivated to combine elements of several prior art references – earlier patents and printed publications – to arrive at the patent owner’s claimed invention,” Law360 reported.

“Petitioner’s showing that the claims are taught by the asserted art is strong, particularly in comparison to patent owner’s weak showing with respect to the asserted secondary considerations of non-obviousness,” the decision said.

Related Articles

Eight Erise Attorneys Selected to 2024 Super Lawyers Lists
Erise IP’s Patent Litigation, IP Litigation, and Patent Law Practices Honored in Best Law Firms Rankings
Eight Erise Attorneys Selected to 2024 Super Lawyers Lists
Erise’s Buresh and Seitz honored again by Benchmark as Litigation Stars
Eight Erise Attorneys Selected to 2024 Super Lawyers Lists
Erise’s Continued PTAB Success is Backed Up by Patexia’s Latest Independent Research Report